home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 04:30:13 PDT
- From: Ham-Digital Mailing List and Newsgroup <ham-digital@ucsd.edu>
- Errors-To: Ham-Digital-Errors@UCSD.Edu
- Reply-To: Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu
- Precedence: Bulk
- Subject: Ham-Digital Digest V94 #287
- To: Ham-Digital
-
-
- Ham-Digital Digest Sun, 28 Aug 94 Volume 94 : Issue 287
-
- Today's Topics:
- 1200/9600 Packet TNC (2 msgs)
- Help, connecting ethernet to JNOS..
- Jnos and PK232MBX ?
- RE >Packet with Mac LC
- TCP/IP over packet trough winsock ...
- TEKK MINI for 19k2 ??
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1994 17:08:45 -0500
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!newshub.nosc.mil!crash!news.sprintlink.net!bga.com!slip216.bga.com!user@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: 1200/9600 Packet TNC
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <xKINk4WzU-yJ069yn@kaiwan.com>, bnovak@kaiwan.com (Bob Novak) wrote:
-
- > Donald..
- > I am using the new Kantronics KPC-9612. It works great and is probably
- > the best deal on the market. I got mine from AES for $199.
- > Bob
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- > | E-Mail: bnovak@kaiwan.com | Packet: K0OK@K6CPT.#LACCA.#SOCA.CA.USA.NA
-
- Bob-
- I sent my KPC9612 back to Kantronics today for warranty fix of software
- carrier detect. If you have used SW DCD, did you have any problems?
- (This would, of course, be only on port 1 - 1200).
- The unit is very nice and gets two thumbs up just as my KPC3 does.
-
- --
- Henry Middlebrook Internet: henrym@bga.com
- Austin, TX AMPRnet: n5shl@n5shl.ampr.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 1994 09:25:58 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!eskimo!rdonnell@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: 1200/9600 Packet TNC
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- Donald Davis (donald.davis@moondog.com) wrote:
- : Any suggestion on which 1200/9600 packet modem is the one to get? What
- : would one do with 9600 baud packet at this time?
-
-
- : I already use a Baycom BP-1 for 1200 baud packet. I wonder what
- : upgrading to a dual speed packet tnc would do for me or what options I
- : would have with a dual speed tnc?
-
- : ---
- : . CMPQwk 1.4 #9206 . I still miss my ex-wife, but my aim is getting bet
-
- Probably the biggest plus of the stand-alone TNC is that your station can be
- on the air when your computer is not up.
-
- As for 9600 operations, you need to find out if there are plans in your area
- (unless >you< are a mover and shaker) to put up some 9600 baud resources.
- Getting going on 9600 is not as easy as 1200. You either have to have 1) a
- radio specificly designed for 9600 operation, or 2) a willingness to do
- radio surgery to bring out the connection points required for 9600
- operation.
-
- What this usually involves (at a minimum) is providing connections to the
- discriminator (or FM IF/detector chip) and into a place in the radio where
- direct FM modulation can be done. Many radios now use the phase-locked loop
- (PLL) as the modulation point. Unfortunatly, because of the nature of
- PLL's, they are designed to correct for frequency errors they find. In the
- case of 9600 baud operation, you are no longer putting tones on an FM audio
- channel. You are acutally putting 'raw' data on the modulator. This means
- that for desired operation, that the modulation point needs to have flat
- frequency response from about 10 Hz to 5 kHz. Most PLL's have a 3dB
- highpass effect at about 100-200 Hz. As yet there is no easy solution to
- the problem, so some rigs will just work better than others. If you still
- plan on getting a 9600 baud TNC, call the manufacturers of the products you
- are considering and ask them 1) about specific radios you may have now, and
- 2) radios they might suggest as good choices. Until about 6 months ago I
- worked for one of the TNC manufacturers (AEA) and know that they are very
- interested in developing information about what works and what does not.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 25 Aug 1994 19:35:13 GMT
- From: EU.net!sunic!isgate!news.rhi.hi.is!bnt@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: Help, connecting ethernet to JNOS..
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- Hello, I have bin trying to connect a computer running JNOS 1.10d
- to an TCP ethernet LAN, without any luck. I'm using an
- Novell NE2000 with a Crynwr packet driver. The commands I put
- in the autoexec.nos are basically the attach command and few
- ifconfig commands, It is based on the WJ7J configuration file
- witch I got in a help packet from some ftp site.
-
- The problem is I can't Telnet, Ftp or ping any comuters, witch are
- on the same LAN, or other computers on Internet. So It must be
- something wrong with the driver or how Im configuring JNOS.
-
- So please if you can assist me in any way,
- it would be greatly appreciated
-
- ... any autoexec.nos examples would be appreciated.
-
- please post or e-mail.
-
- tnx in advance
- 73 de TF3BNT
- Benedikt Sveinsson
- Reykjavik, Iceland
-
- e-mail: bnt@rhi.hi.is
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 1994 19:38:43 GMT
- From: news.sprintlink.net!news.dorsai.org!wa2vos@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: Jnos and PK232MBX ?
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- Wouldn't be a bad idea to replace the battery unless you intend on
- running the tcp/ip on a full time basis as you have to operate tcp/ip in
- the "Kiss" mode. I have been using my PK232mbx ever since I bought it
- back in 1989 with the battery installed and never had a bit of problem.
- Good luck and let me know via email how you make out
- jim
-
- Daniel Curry (pineapp@netcom.com) wrote:
- : I have a pk232 that was upgraded to a pk232MBX. I would like
- : to use this for 2 meter tcp/ip. The question is do I need to
- : have a battery install in the pk232? The reason for the
- : question is that when I purchased the pk232 the manual stated that
- : do not put batteries in. With the upgrade kit it came with a
- : nicad battery. I have not install the nicad.
-
-
- : --
- : .----------------------------------------------+--------------------------.
- : | INTERNET: pineapp@netcom.com (DC436) | Daniel Curry WB6STW |
- : | AMPRNET : dan@wb6stw.ampr.org [44.4.20.144] | E-:-) Ham Radio Operator |
- : | AX.25 : wb6stw@n0ary.#NOCAL.CA.USA.NA | Redwood City, CA USA |
- : '----------------------------------------------+--------------------------'
- --
- -----+++++WA2VOS+++++-----
- Jim Jaffe Friendship through Ham Radio
- Fellow Traveler in Cyber Space
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 1994 23:27:01 -0400
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newstf01.cr1.aol.com!search01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: RE >Packet with Mac LC
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <314@kk6wb>, jerry@kk6wb.kg6kf.ampr.ORG (Jerry Benterou)
- writes:
-
- >does anyone know how to use a mac (lc) for packet radio, i.e. with the
- baycom
- >or another
- >modem?
-
- In keeping with the thread... I am using an LC with a kantronics KPC-2
- hooked to the printer port... The station runs on Red Ryder 10.3 which is
- available at many ftp sites. I got my initial packetsettings from AOL in
- the Ham radio area... ?'s drop me a note, you will get a faster response
- with e-mail as I omnly check the newsgroup once or twice a week :-)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1994 10:55:29
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!galaxy.ucr.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!ub4b!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be!rc1.vub.ac.be!artipc2!dany@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: TCP/IP over packet trough winsock ...
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- I've just tried the modified Crynwr driver, called ethrax25.
- This should allow me to use tcp/ip through windows sockets.
- I tried it, and everything seems to start.
- I used the latest version of Trumpet winsock, and the latest version
- of ws_ftp. If I try the FTP, the TNC does transmit something, but
- the trumpet winsock stuff immediatly gives an ARP time out, and
- a TCP error. It also stops retrying very soon.
- Has anyone got experience with this?
-
- Thanks in advance
-
- dany@arti.vub.ac.be
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 27 Aug 1994 14:03:56 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!isgate!news.rhi.hi.is!bnt@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: TEKK MINI for 19k2 ??
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- Hello all.
-
- I'we heard lot about this TEKK MINI 70cm crystal rx/tx.
- It appears that it is ready to go to 9k6, but what about
- 19k2, is it hard to get it up that speed. I assume you have
- to do something about the IF filters, so is it hard or
- expensive to get new filters for that station and is it
- hard to replace them.
-
- Any input welcome..
-
- 73 de TF3BNT
- Benedikt Sveinsson
- Reykjavik, Iceland.
- e-mail: bnt@rhi.hi.is
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: (null)
- From: (null)
- For radios I have sucessfully used:
- Icom IC-290 (the first radio I modified)
- Icom IC-22S (uses diode matrix synthsizer in 15 kHz steps. Designed for
- 146-148, tho usually goes to 145.35 or so OK.)
- GE MVP (high band VHF - xtal controlled, easy to modify)
-
- I currently use the GE on the local 2M packet repeater, as I hope one day to
- get the IC-290 back on SSB. The IC-22S is probably going to get modified to
- 20 kHz channel spacing and to cover the whole 2M band. Then it will
- probably go into my (ever evolving) portable packet station.
-
- Hope that gives some insight on 9600 operations.
-
- 73
-
- Bob
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | Bob Donnell, kd7nm bob@ethanac.kd7nm.ampr.org rdonnell@eskimo.com |
- | Western Washington Amateur IP Address Coordinator (206) 775-3651 |
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Aug 94 08:06:11 -0600
- From: news.cerf.net!gopher.sdsc.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!eff!wariat.org!malgudi.oar.net!news.ysu.edu!news.cps.udayton.edu!udecc.engr.@@ihnp4.ucsd.edu
- To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-
- References <1994Aug18.144706.28341@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, <119955@cup.portal.com>, <Cv0nur.ACy@utnetw.utoledo.edu>.corne
- Reply-To : fulks@hap.arnold.af.mil
- Subject : Re: Looking for DXCluster software
-
- In article <Cv0nur.ACy@utnetw.utoledo.edu>, pouelle@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
- |> In article <1994Aug20.143652.9960@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) writes:
- |> >In article <3306v8$jbi@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> k9cw@prairienet.org (Andrew B. White) writes:
- |> Gary,
- |> We may have to watch the term broadcasting. The FCC takes a dim view of
- |> broadcasting in amateur freqs. Now don't get yourself all bent out of
- |> shape - and don't go grabbing your Part 97 and flaming me with quotes from
- |> the current regulations. I am just pointing out that while the broadcast
- |> model uses the frequency more efficently, the FCC may not like the hoards of
- |> HAMs using it without special permission. I personally could do without
- |> the FCC knocking on my door with a NAL.
- |>
- |> I suspect special arangements would need to be made similar to the ARRL's
- |> for broadcasting their code practice & such.
- |>
- |> Patrick
- |> KB8PYM
- |>
- |> Yes, I could be wrong, but please don't tell me - I KNOW the world is flat!
- |>
- |>
- Possibly you are correct in watching the term, but it is not broadcasting
- in the sense of the ARRL's broadcast of "code practice and such". This
- is a network broadcast. It is a transmission to a special address that
- can be received by more than one station. It is still usually sent to
- some "callsign" (in the IP world that call is usually QST for AX.25). It
- also implies that there is no acknowledgement of receipt.
- If you are concerned about getting a NAL over this, you had better make
- sure that you don't have your TNC setup to do a beacon or even ID itself
- regularly as these are the same type of things.
- 73,
- --
- Kelly L. Fulks Reply to: @hap.arnold.af.mil:c60283@troi.aedc
- Scientific Programmer/Analyst : fulks@hap.arnold.af.mil
- OAO Corporation : kelly@kc4rdj.raider.net
- Arnold Air Force Base, TN 37389 : csklf@knuth.mtsu.edu
-
- Amateur Radio: KC4RDJ@AB4ZB.#MIDTN.TN.USA.NA
- : kc4rdj.ampr.org. [44.34.0.9]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Ham-Digital Digest V94 #287
- ******************************
-